Comparison

Li-Ning vs Nike running shoes: the equivalent of every model

Feidian 6 vs Alphafly 3, Red Hare 9 Pro vs Pegasus 42 and the rest: each Li-Ning running shoe against its nearest Nike, with AU prices.

Li-Ning Feidian 6 Elite (left) and Nike Alphafly 3 (right), side-on product photos
Product photos: Running Warehouse AU, Nike
Verdict

The Feidian 6 Elite is a genuine Alphafly 3 alternative for A$90 less, and the Red Hare 9 Pro and Chaoying Pro line up well with the Pegasus 42 and Pegasus Plus 2. Nike wins on fit, stability and availability. Below the trainers, Li-Ning has no shoe you can sensibly cross-shop against Nike in Australia.

Against Nike, Li-Ning’s strongest card is the Feidian 6 Elite: an independent lab tested it head to head with the Alphafly 3 and found it livelier, for A$299.95 against A$390. The weakest is everything below the daily trainers, where Li-Ning’s shoes are import-only and barely specified.

This page takes each Li-Ning running shoe in turn and names the Nike it most resembles. It is part of a set: the overview of all three brands, plus Li-Ning vs Puma and Li-Ning vs Adidas.

Background first: how Li-Ning and Anta caught up with Nike, Adidas and Puma.

Matches are made on function: category, foam, plate, stack and drop. It is a spec-and-source comparison, not a wear test.

The match table

Li-NingNike equivalentLi-Ning priceNike priceMatch
Feidian 6 EliteAlphafly 3A$299.95A$390Strong
Feidian 6 UltraAlphafly 3A$499.95A$390Good
Feidian 6 ChallengerZoom Fly 6A$219.96A$260Good
Red Hare 9 UltraVomero PlusA$239.95A$260Moderate
Red Hare 9 ProPegasus 42A$159.99 RRPFrom A$220Good
Chaoying Pro (Super Shadow)Pegasus Plus 2A$159.99 RRPA$260Good
Yueying 6 ProVomero 18Import onlyA$220 (women’s)Moderate
Red Hare 9 / Yueying 6Winflo 11A$119.99 / importNot on AU siteWeak
Dilu 2 / Dilu 2 PROPegasus Trail 5 / UltraflyImport onlyNot on AU siteWeak
Liejun 8Structure 26Import onlyA$230 (men’s)Weak
Jueying 4Vomero Premium, in conceptImport onlyA$340Poor

Prices: Li-Ning from Running Warehouse AU, or RRP at Blue Sky Athletics where marked; Nike from nike.com/au. Checked 11 October 2026.

Racing: Feidian 6 vs Alphafly, Vaporfly and Zoom Fly

Feidian 6 Elite vs Alphafly 3. This is the best-supported match in the whole Li-Ning range. RTINGS compared them directly: the Li-Ning is more energetic with a more aggressive rocker; the Nike is slightly lighter and more stable. The Elite measured 205.1 g in a men’s US 9, with a 39.7 mm heel and 5.4 mm drop. If you want something lighter and lower than either, the Vaporfly 4 (A$360) is Nike’s other option.

Feidian 6 Ultra vs Alphafly 3. The Ultra uses two Super BOOM capsules and an asymmetric two-tier carbon plate. RTINGS found it works best for forefoot strikers who load it cleanly — a narrower brief than the Alphafly, which suits a wider range of runners. It is also the only Li-Ning that costs more than its Nike rival: A$499.95 against A$390. And its measured drop was 9.3 mm against a claimed 6 mm.

Feidian 6 Challenger vs Zoom Fly 6. Both are carbon-plated trainers you can race in at a lower price. The Challenger uses Super BOOM over BOOM with a split-toe carbon plate, and is A$40 cheaper. It also looks lighter — reviewers report around 195–205 g — but nobody has lab-tested it, so treat that as indicative.

Training: Red Hare 9 and Chaoying Pro vs Pegasus and Vomero

Nike Pegasus 42 running shoe, side view
Nike Pegasus 42, the Red Hare 9 Pro's closest Nike match. Image: Nike

Red Hare 9 Pro vs Pegasus 42. The closest everyday match. Both are durable, unplated, do-everything trainers. The Red Hare 9 Pro measured 231.8 g with a 36.0 mm heel and 7.6 mm drop at RTINGS, which compared its forefoot firmness to the Zoom Fly 6. It is A$60 cheaper at RRP, but only small shops stock it.

Chaoying Pro vs Pegasus Plus 2. A light up-tempo trainer with a Super BOOM core in a supercritical EVA frame. RTINGS measured a 40.9 mm heel, 222.5 g and a 10.1 mm drop — well above the 7 mm some sources claim. Its arch is extremely narrow by RTINGS’s measure, which matters more against a Nike than against most brands.

Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra running shoe, side view
Li-Ning Red Hare 9 Ultra. Image: Running Warehouse AU

Red Hare 9 Ultra vs Vomero Plus. The Red Hare 9 Ultra stacks a 46.2 mm heel into 237.2 g of PEBA. Nike’s tallest shoe, the Vomero Premium, goes higher still — Supwell measured 55 mm — but weighed about 100 g more in the same size. The Vomero Plus is the nearer feel at a similar price. The Red Hare’s weakness is stability: RTINGS scored it 6.3.

Yueying 6 Pro vs Vomero 18. Same job — a soft, protective daily shoe for heavier or slower runners. Li-Ning publishes no stack or weight for it, so this is a category match only.

Trail, stability and the rest

These matches are my judgement from category and foam type. Li-Ning publishes almost nothing for these shoes outside China.

  • Dilu 2 vs Pegasus Trail 5. Both are everyday trail shoes. The Dilu 2 weighs a reported 298 g.
  • Dilu 2 PRO vs ZoomX Ultrafly Trail. Both are carbon-plated trail racers. The Dilu 2 PRO is reported at 243 g.
  • Liejun 8 vs Structure 26. Both are stability trainers; the Liejun uses a BOA dial and pull-lace system.
  • No Nike equivalent: the Liejun 8 Pro (carbon-plated stability) and Dilu 2 CTRL (supportive carbon trail). Nike sells neither type.
  • Jueying 4. A tall lifestyle runner that Chinese reviewers describe as a fashion shoe. The Vomero Premium is closest in concept, not in purpose.

Which should you buy?

  • Marathon racing: Feidian 6 Elite, if your feet are narrow-to-normal. Alphafly 3 if you want more stability or a roomier fit.
  • Fast forefoot strikers only: Feidian 6 Ultra — but at A$110 more than an Alphafly, the case is thin.
  • One shoe for everything: Pegasus 42 for fit and easy returns; Red Hare 9 Pro to save A$60.
  • Hybrid racing: neither brand’s carbon racer belongs on a sled. See carbon plates in HYROX and the Nike Metcon 9 review.
  • Anything import-only: stick with the Nike unless you are comfortable with the grey-import trade-offs.